Software companies that do not know: all finished product is by definition obsolete. And while everyone knows that when you program puts an end to a program, it could have a number of new options that were not made for all sorts of reasons, always leave it for the next version. According to the nature of software has been written, revisions and improvements to a program can probably be six months or perhaps a year. Because, as the software moves, cycles of improvements and new versions seem to be doing less and less time.
![]()
And this seems to be happening with Microsoft and its Windows product. A few years ago left Windows 7, which seemed to be a better version of Windows Vista, which was widely criticized, though in my opinion, version 7 was a slightly modified Vista. In fact, no company begins any version from scratch, but that takes the best of the above and modified it does not seem to serve. And version 7 has been quite stable, but it was Microsoft with Windows 8 and its Metro GUI (which ceased to be so called because of problems with copyright, I think). Anyway, I started out with Windows 8 computers and lo and behold, the start button was missing. Bad idea because it is difficult to change the habits of users so many years. Microsoft finally had to concede that they could not easily get rid of this famous "start button" and rejoined in version 8.1.
Windows 8 is in fact no different to version 7 If it were not for the interface with mosaic "tiles", seem to have the old operating interface. In a Microsoft event I got to see how they did certain apps to Windows 8 using the idea of "tiles" and it was really surprising, because in a few lines of code were very nice things, but ... this was a sufficient argument to be made in Windows 8? Many people thought no, and kept in version 7 In fact, some people still use Windows XP, which for the needs and capabilities of the current hardware and looks really insufficient and should be thinking about migrating but hey, that's up to each who migrate because the first effect is that many programs do not work or have difficulty functioning as they once did.
Now Microsoft is releasing the Windows version 9 and say they will announce it on September 30. What will be the reaction of the consumer on this platform? Hard to tell, especially since there are opinions that fall radically between two poles: very good and very bad product. Is there a need to remove version 9 and when in fact 8 has not been as successful in adopting the new system because in general, it takes longer to adopt a new version of the operating system that the adoption of a new version of any other program? How much more you can do to convince version 9?
Reasons for Microsoft and releases a new version of its Windows speaks of what some have called planned obsolescence, but in the case of Windows 8, does anyone think it's an outdated version? It seems to me that no. It is a fact that a company like Microsoft, who lives to generate a lot of money with the sales of its software products, find that users continue to acquire new versions. They know that in this industry because no one can sit still but they eat the competitors. And Microsoft, in all these years, has never shown to be resting on its laurels and it shows newer versions of Office, or its Windows operating system, with less and less time between release and version. However, I do not know if they are approaching the limit of the users that own reasons, decide that Windows 9 is coming too soon.
But you, the reader / binary / a, what do you think?
Windows 8 is in fact no different to version 7 If it were not for the interface with mosaic "tiles", seem to have the old operating interface. In a Microsoft event I got to see how they did certain apps to Windows 8 using the idea of "tiles" and it was really surprising, because in a few lines of code were very nice things, but ... this was a sufficient argument to be made in Windows 8? Many people thought no, and kept in version 7 In fact, some people still use Windows XP, which for the needs and capabilities of the current hardware and looks really insufficient and should be thinking about migrating but hey, that's up to each who migrate because the first effect is that many programs do not work or have difficulty functioning as they once did.
Now Microsoft is releasing the Windows version 9 and say they will announce it on September 30. What will be the reaction of the consumer on this platform? Hard to tell, especially since there are opinions that fall radically between two poles: very good and very bad product. Is there a need to remove version 9 and when in fact 8 has not been as successful in adopting the new system because in general, it takes longer to adopt a new version of the operating system that the adoption of a new version of any other program? How much more you can do to convince version 9?
Reasons for Microsoft and releases a new version of its Windows speaks of what some have called planned obsolescence, but in the case of Windows 8, does anyone think it's an outdated version? It seems to me that no. It is a fact that a company like Microsoft, who lives to generate a lot of money with the sales of its software products, find that users continue to acquire new versions. They know that in this industry because no one can sit still but they eat the competitors. And Microsoft, in all these years, has never shown to be resting on its laurels and it shows newer versions of Office, or its Windows operating system, with less and less time between release and version. However, I do not know if they are approaching the limit of the users that own reasons, decide that Windows 9 is coming too soon.
But you, the reader / binary / a, what do you think?